About
Islamic Revolutionary interested in precipitating a convergence of all the present Islamic revivalist and resistance movements to challenge Western hegemony and establish a universal Islamic government, the Khalifate.
Global Intifada
[Islam and Revolution] A Blog Dedicated to the Intellectual Revival of Islam.
[ View Content | View Sidebar]
Posts
“precipitating a convergence of all the present Islamic revivalist and resistance movements to challenge Western hegemony and establish a universal Islamic government, the Khalifate.”
Count me in. :)
July 16, 2007 @ 11:12 pm
inshaAllah.
:)
July 19, 2007 @ 5:23 pm
Salaam, brother. Like you I would like to contribute to the “convergence of all the present Islamic revivalist and resistance movements to challenge Western hegemony and establish a universal Islamic government, the Khalifate”. From my teenage years on, I have hoped to be an Islamic author, revivalist, and revolutionary. I am lagging behind in my studies and intellectual capacity greatly, but I am hoping to improve things in time.
Can you contact me through my new email address attached to this comment? I am someone you know. (I want to erase a great deal of my past and start anew both online and in real life, hence the new nickname.)
July 25, 2007 @ 6:27 am
As salaam aleikum!
Masha Allah
! Love your stuff bro…
I read you say the following and was wondering if you could provide me with some books, links or sources for the following
“Again, we cannot attack the Shaykh’s ideas if we don’t have any accurate information about them. So the Shaykh’s brother wrote a refutation about him? What does that prove? Imam Juwayni wrote scathing criticism’s of Imam Abu Hanifa. Imam Bukhari was kicked out of Tirmidh for his views on the createdness of the Qu’ran. Islamic intellectual history is a history full of refutations and counter-refutations. It does not prove the orthodoxy or unorthodoxy of a particular thinker.
In order to show that Shaykh Muhammad’s ideology was unorthodox, you’d have to show that it was abnormal, even from a Hanbali perspective. The mere fact that the teacher who introduced the works of Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah was an Ashari Nasqhbandi Sufi shows that Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah wasn’t considered a “whack†thinker. If even Sufis are teaching his works, how bad can they be? In terms of his anti-kalam stance, the majority of Hanbalis have opposed ilm ul kalam, so there’s no surprise there. â€
I REALLY want to know this…Jazaka Allahu khayran in advance!
December 9, 2007 @ 2:36 am
Why do you write “Khalifate”, rather than the correct Arabic “Khilafah” or the English “Caliphate”?
December 19, 2007 @ 3:23 pm
Thats a good question. I think I picked it up from the British Muslims. Shaykh AbdulQadir as-Sufi, the leader of the Murabitun, has a book called “The Return of the Khalifate” and I believe Hizb e Tehrir spells it like that as well.
You are correct, it should be either Khilafah or Caliphate. Blarmy!
December 19, 2007 @ 6:34 pm
salaams Brother
I read your blog with great interest.
You may find our website interesting.
It would be great to hear from you salaams
Nadia
September 4, 2008 @ 7:26 am
Wa alaikum assalam
Looks like an excellent site. I’ll add it to my blogroll if you don’t mind.
masalama
September 4, 2008 @ 6:24 pm